I’m curious to how long people feel is more ‘equitable’ and also how much to value those who initially staked the pool, who took the biggest risk when there was the most uncertainty surrounding the project
If we extend the schedule I think it would be fair to significantly reduce any issuance, and to potentially weight the bulk of the rewards to those staking the governance pool, who are locking in their commitment.
EDIT: Sorry, i think i misunderstood the topic >.< but it’s about burning the keys after finishing emissions? which I also agree with, as locking in the supply cap by destroying the minting keys seems confidence building, as well