# Yfi\_whale Proposals List

**URL:** <https://gov.yearn.fi/t/yfi-whale-proposals-list/348>\
**Category:** Vaults\
**Created:** [23 July 2020 01:04 UTC](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/yfi-whale-proposals-list/348 "2020-07-23T01:04:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 45

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sinsecato](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e68b1a/32.png) [@Sinsecato](https://gov.yearn.fi/u/Sinsecato)\
**Post date:** [24 July 2020 01:16 UTC](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/yfi-whale-proposals-list/348/45 "2020-07-24T01:16:56Z")

</div>

> [@ChainLinkGod](#):
>
> This could be replaced by a traditional automated buy-back and burn scheme (although this runs contrary to inflation and doesn’t make much sense).

I am leaning in favor of an automated buy-back and burn plan for some of the reasons described [here](http://gov.yearn.fi/t/idea-alternate-model-of-yfi-burn/428). To address this specific objection, it makes sense because it gives us two separate tools to use. Sometimes circumstances may warrant adding issuance as the DeFi space evolves, and at other times issuance won’t be useful and being able to reduce supply would be an appropriate tool. Also it is not as contrary to inflation as it seems. The APY of issuance to YPool etc would look just as good and incentivize just as effectively even if we were simultaneously using the fees generated by new TVL to buy and burn YFI.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/yfi-whale-proposals-list/348)._
