# \*\*\[Proposal\]\*\* Developer Incentives

**URL:** <https://gov.yearn.fi/t/proposal-developer-incentives/8920>\
**Category:** Protocol and Governance\
**Created:** [12 January 2021 23:31 UTC](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/proposal-developer-incentives/8920 "2021-01-12T23:31:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 202

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beepidibop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ce7236/32.png) [@Beepidibop](https://gov.yearn.fi/u/Beepidibop)\
**Post date:** [15 January 2021 18:28 UTC](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/proposal-developer-incentives/8920/202 "2021-01-15T18:28:21Z")

</div>

Yes, I think a separation of funding mechanism vs governance will avoid a lot of conflicts of interest down the line. We can treat YFI.B as a promise of periodic returns (fees) for funding yearn operations.

I’ve gone over it a bit [here](http://gov.yearn.fi/t/proposal-buyback-and-build/8929/87) before.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/proposal-developer-incentives/8920)._