I think splits are kind of gimmicky, but I can’t say it’s an ineffective gimmick
If we Look at Berkshire Hathaway. They’ve never done one and seem to be doing ok (despite their stodginess) I think Yearn could be kind of like the BRK of Crypto, we’ve got amazing devs, and we’re building up a suite of protocols that cover almost every niche of defi.
I think the argument could be made that being highly priced makes sense for Yearn, just like it does for BRK.A.
However, they do have a BRK.B though that is a lower priced option. That option was largely done to help people get a piece of BRK before fractional shares were a thing though. There’s nothing stopping someone from buying .0001 YFI today. (I do acknowledge that mentally it’s nice to have a whole one of something though)
I’d prefer not to tie up the devs time with something that’s not really moving the DeFi Space forward as much as just copy/pasting number go up tricks from Trad-fi