# Deriswap + StableCredit

**URL:** https://gov.yearn.fi/t/deriswap-stablecredit/8435
**Category:** Projects
**Created:** [2 December 2020 04:30 UTC](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/deriswap-stablecredit/8435 "2020-12-02T04:30:32Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nagolinc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/7feea3/32.png) [@nagolinc](https://gov.yearn.fi/u/nagolinc)
#### Post date: [2 December 2020 04:30 UTC](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/deriswap-stablecredit/8435/1 "2020-12-02T04:30:32Z")

</div>

If the goal of the ongoing “mergers” is to aggregate liquidity and avoid redundant code, why is Yearn working on both Deriswap (to be hosted by SushiSwap) and StableCredit (to be hosted by Cream)?

Wouldn’t it make more sense to focus on building a single market with the maximum possible liquidity (presumably by adding derivatives to StableCredit)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/yearn/original/2X/9/9ae7183c96201b2e9a60ad06d0d7664a3e90aeb0.png) [@system](https://gov.yearn.fi/u/system)
#### Post date: [9 December 2020 04:30 UTC](https://gov.yearn.fi/t/deriswap-stablecredit/8435/2 "2020-12-09T04:30:33Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.