Consolidating some comments and views from the unofficial discord and this thread
-
Lower inflation Schedule : 150% may be too high @deltatiger came up with a spreadsheet ^ taking a spin at 100% inflation
-
Incentives streaming, should it go entirely to just this one pool based of this proposal or should it go to multiple different parties for example
-
- Users
-
- Liquidity Provision (Allow anyone ease of entry to the ecosystem/YFI)
-
- Governance Participation
-
- Developers
-
- Reserve, Can be used to cover the Safety of protocol (Audits /Insurance etc) and development grants for community
- The weightage of the 80/20 YFI/yCRV pool from 2/98 YFI/yCRV might be too drastic of a shift immediately, how about a tiered transition from 98/2 yCRV/YFI -> 80/20 yCRV/YFI -> 60/40 yCRV/YFI
a) A shift to 80/20 exposes LPs to a lot of price fluctuations
b) Would lead to a large underutilised yCRV which we do not want in the ecosystem
c) We still want YFI holders to have a larger say than say Stablecoin whales, which was my original thinking from shifting to 80/20 YFI/yCRV
d) YFI Rewards Pool as someone else mentioned would still continue and this would also suck up some YFI Float for the time being, we should avoid a liquidity Pool Skewed too much on YFI to prevent illiquidity concerns